I'm currently writing an essay about some of the strong female characters in the Shakespeare plays I've read, and it has occurred to me that many of them are so powerful because they demonstrate a certain amount of courage and boldness, which is generally considered a masculine trait. I don't think I'll explore this in my essay, but I wonder to what extent gendered traits are social constructs and to what extent those traits are actually inherent to the gendered spirits we had, even before we were born and exposed to any Earthly cultures.
Courage, for example, seems to be a virtue, no matter what a person's gender is (though perhaps I only see courage as an inherent virtue because I am a man and thus courage is inherently virtuous to me). Granted, I can imagine situations where too much courage can be a vice, consistent with Aristotle's virtue theory of ethics, but I wonder, is that point inherently reached sooner for women than for men? It's normally a man's role to protect women, so a man should rush into battle in situations where women should run to safety. However, this protective role may merely be a societal construction since fewer males are needed to maintain and grow a population. From the perspective of the population as a whole, men are more expendable, and thus better suited to dangerous tasks, like fighting. This may also be part of the reason men are typically stronger than women. Since men are risked in combat more often, the ones that survive are usually the stronger ones, and they're the ones who pass on more of their genes.
However, when we're all immortal, no one will need protecting. Will courage still be a virtue then, for anyone? And whether it's a virtue or not, is courage an inherent trait, already part of our spirits before they're born? If so, is this trait more common in man than in women? Is it an actually inherent trait, or is the apparent link between courage and masculinity just an effect of the societies in which most of us were raised? Are there inherent masculine and feminine traits? If not, what does it mean to say that disembodied male and female spirits are different? Or, if there are inherent masculine and feminine traits, which traits are which?
I may not get definite answers to these questions. I may or may not even keep asking them. But I still wonder, if only in passing, what the differences between male and female spirits are. Are there traits shared by more male spirits than female ones or vice versa? I assume there must have been. Otherwise, what could it possibly mean that some spirits are male and others as female? They must have distinguishable, inherent traits. I'll admit that his is more confusing than it is edifying, and there are so many other factors, it's really hard to tell which traits are inherent and which are learned. And it probably doesn't matter.
Suffice it to say that men and women complete each other, regardless of which traits allow them to do that and which ones are inherent and which ones are learned.